tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2467994117916260529.post2693869949231217710..comments2023-10-17T08:19:17.319-07:00Comments on Conditioning Research: Connections.....Chrishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00223657383325055342noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2467994117916260529.post-55532526943809036962008-04-25T06:00:00.000-07:002008-04-25T06:00:00.000-07:00Craigthanks for the comment - it makes a lot fo se...Craig<BR/><BR/>thanks for the comment - it makes a lot fo sense. I came across a couple of interesting new football related studies that I'll put up later on that support what you are saying.Chrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00223657383325055342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2467994117916260529.post-1346797637294961162008-04-25T05:35:00.000-07:002008-04-25T05:35:00.000-07:00Hi Chris This has implications in game sports or m...Hi Chris This has implications in game sports or multi sprint sports such as football (soccer) and training should reflect the game. Completing distances over a distance greater than what is run in a game is to me a waste. I advocate repeated sprints over distances not greater than 20-25metres for these type of sports and utilising change of direction and acceleration/deceleration is what is required. I will report to you some prelimary results of some recent work soon<BR/><BR/>Regards<BR/><BR/>CraigDr Craig S. Duncanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07581669866946470907noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2467994117916260529.post-9495898692952999942008-04-24T22:17:00.000-07:002008-04-24T22:17:00.000-07:00I know - unfortunately this is another case in whi...I know - unfortunately this is another case in which the abstract doesn't tell the whole story.Chrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00223657383325055342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2467994117916260529.post-89288548873111118542008-04-24T22:05:00.000-07:002008-04-24T22:05:00.000-07:00Although that conclusion makes sense as a former 4...Although that conclusion makes sense as a former 400/800 runner, I'm a little bit confused as to how they arrived at it. When they say "aerobic and anaerobic processes contribute equally to maximal exercise lasting approximately 60 s" I'm assuming they are referring to the 400, but in their results, they only report on the energy supplies for the 100 and 800. Did they just assume the 400 ought to fall somewhere between the two? That seems like an illogical jump to me.Christopherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09458217267710165049noreply@blogger.com