I bet this study will not get much attention. If it was finding that wholegrains prevent cancer it would be all over the place but that is not what they found. The results:
What do they conclude?
Er.....but what about the whole grains!? Doesn't your study suggest that they are associated with increased incidence of cancer?
Dietary GI, GL, II, or fiber was not associated with risk of total or subgroups of prostate cancer. We observed a positive association between dietary intake of whole grains and total prostate cancer (HR highest versus lowest quintile 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.24), which was attenuated after restriction to PSA-screened participants (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.91-1.17).
What do they conclude?
These results suggest that long-term exposure to a diet with a high insulin response does not affect prostate cancer incidence.
Er.....but what about the whole grains!? Doesn't your study suggest that they are associated with increased incidence of cancer?
Comments
The study appeared in a crap journal because the findings are uninteresting and the evidence sparse. Maybe there is a connection, but this study didn't show it.
Please learn to run screaming from epidemiological research unless it's substantiated by validation. I say this as a statistician who works with clinicians and epidemiologists. Clinicians believe nothing, epidemiologists believe everything. I usually side with the clinicians.
This blog in the past has often warned of the dangers of epidemiology and that correlation doesn't equal causation etc.
Saying all that, I remain unconvinced that grains are healthy.