Ok now this is another useful one. A few weeks ago I posted a study which indicated that explosive reps were better than slow ones for developing power.
This is a study that indicates that explosive reps are actually better at raising the metabolism and using more energy during the exercise and afterwards. The researchers note that "by using explosive contractions and moderate exercise intensity, experienced recreational exercisers can increase their energy expenditure during and after resistance exercise, and this could enhance weight-loss adaptations."
Effect of Explosive versus Slow Contractions and Exercise Intensity on Energy Expenditure.
Mazzetti S, Douglass M, Yocum A, Harber M.
OBJECTIVE:: The primary purpose of this study was to compare the effects of explosive versus slow contractions on the rate of energy expenditure during and after resistance exercise.
METHODS:: Nine men (20 +/- 2.5 yr) performed three exercise protocols using a plate-loaded squat machine, and a no-exercise (CONTROL) session in a randomly assigned, counterbalanced order. Subjects performed squats using either two second (SLOW) or explosive concentric contractions (EXPL), but identical repetitions (), sets (), and loads (60% 1RM). A secondary objective was to compare high- versus moderate-intensity exercise. Thus, a third protocol was performed that also used explosive contractions, with heavier loads (80% 1RM) and six sets of four reps (HEAVYEXPL). Eccentric reps (2 s), work (reps x sets x load), range of motion, and rest intervals between sets (90 s) were identical among all three protocols. Expired air was collected continuously for 20 min before, during, and 1 h after exercise and for about 1.5 h during CONTROL. Blood samples (25 muL) were collected before, immediately after, and 15, 30, 45, and 60 min after each protocol, and these samples were analyzed for blood lactate (mM).
RESULTS:: Average rates of energy expenditure (kcal.min) were significantly greater (P 6.43 +/- 1.64 and 6.25 +/- 1.55, respectively) and after (2.54 +/- 1.44 > 2.38 +/- 1.31 and 2.21 +/- 1.08, respectively) EXPL compared with SLOW and HEAVYEXPL, despite significantly (P
CONCLUSION:: Squat exercise using explosive contractions and moderate intensity induced a greater increase in the rate of energy expenditure than squats using slow contractions or high intensity in all subjects tested. Thus, by using explosive contractions and moderate exercise intensity, experienced recreational exercisers can increase their energy expenditure during and after resistance exercise, and this could enhance weight-loss adaptations.
This bit about the energy expenditure afterwards is important. This is commonly referred to as EPOC (excess post-exercise oxygen consumption) and it means that you consume a great deal more oxygen recovering from the exercise. Alwyn Cosgrove writes a little about EPOC here.
So I am proposing a routine for fat loss that would build on this putting this study together with those that indicate the advantages of interval training in boosting EPOC.
So what about a routine of explosive intervals. For example:
* 30 seconds of jumps squats followed by 30 seconds of rest repeated 10 times; or
* Tabata sets (20s on, 10 s rest) with one arm dumbell snatches (suggested by Joe)
The science indicates that - even with moderate or no resistance - these would build power and burn fat! The important thing is to be explosive and to make it hard work in the intervals.
Try it, see what you think.
Of course others have already come up with this idea. Bryce's B circuits are a similar approach. Or Alwyn Cosgrove's leg matrix which you can see demonstrated below, by the great Steve Shafley:
This is a study that indicates that explosive reps are actually better at raising the metabolism and using more energy during the exercise and afterwards. The researchers note that "by using explosive contractions and moderate exercise intensity, experienced recreational exercisers can increase their energy expenditure during and after resistance exercise, and this could enhance weight-loss adaptations."
Effect of Explosive versus Slow Contractions and Exercise Intensity on Energy Expenditure.
Mazzetti S, Douglass M, Yocum A, Harber M.
OBJECTIVE:: The primary purpose of this study was to compare the effects of explosive versus slow contractions on the rate of energy expenditure during and after resistance exercise.
METHODS:: Nine men (20 +/- 2.5 yr) performed three exercise protocols using a plate-loaded squat machine, and a no-exercise (CONTROL) session in a randomly assigned, counterbalanced order. Subjects performed squats using either two second (SLOW) or explosive concentric contractions (EXPL), but identical repetitions (), sets (), and loads (60% 1RM). A secondary objective was to compare high- versus moderate-intensity exercise. Thus, a third protocol was performed that also used explosive contractions, with heavier loads (80% 1RM) and six sets of four reps (HEAVYEXPL). Eccentric reps (2 s), work (reps x sets x load), range of motion, and rest intervals between sets (90 s) were identical among all three protocols. Expired air was collected continuously for 20 min before, during, and 1 h after exercise and for about 1.5 h during CONTROL. Blood samples (25 muL) were collected before, immediately after, and 15, 30, 45, and 60 min after each protocol, and these samples were analyzed for blood lactate (mM).
RESULTS:: Average rates of energy expenditure (kcal.min) were significantly greater (P 6.43 +/- 1.64 and 6.25 +/- 1.55, respectively) and after (2.54 +/- 1.44 > 2.38 +/- 1.31 and 2.21 +/- 1.08, respectively) EXPL compared with SLOW and HEAVYEXPL, despite significantly (P
CONCLUSION:: Squat exercise using explosive contractions and moderate intensity induced a greater increase in the rate of energy expenditure than squats using slow contractions or high intensity in all subjects tested. Thus, by using explosive contractions and moderate exercise intensity, experienced recreational exercisers can increase their energy expenditure during and after resistance exercise, and this could enhance weight-loss adaptations.
This bit about the energy expenditure afterwards is important. This is commonly referred to as EPOC (excess post-exercise oxygen consumption) and it means that you consume a great deal more oxygen recovering from the exercise. Alwyn Cosgrove writes a little about EPOC here.
So I am proposing a routine for fat loss that would build on this putting this study together with those that indicate the advantages of interval training in boosting EPOC.
So what about a routine of explosive intervals. For example:
* 30 seconds of jumps squats followed by 30 seconds of rest repeated 10 times; or
* Tabata sets (20s on, 10 s rest) with one arm dumbell snatches (suggested by Joe)
The science indicates that - even with moderate or no resistance - these would build power and burn fat! The important thing is to be explosive and to make it hard work in the intervals.
Try it, see what you think.
Of course others have already come up with this idea. Bryce's B circuits are a similar approach. Or Alwyn Cosgrove's leg matrix which you can see demonstrated below, by the great Steve Shafley:
Comments