Last night I pointed to a piece on Lifehacker which listed some health myths which they "busted". One of them was to do with cholesterol. Of course the cholesterol hypothesis as usually understood is a pile of microbiome, and initially Lifehacker in their post pointed this out. I cut and pasted the relevant paragraph into yesterday's post.
Today that whole paragraph has disappeared! Instead there is something on snake venom with this footnote:
What a bunch of tossers! They originally pointed to Malcolm Kendrick and Chris Kresser who refuted the cholesterol hypothesis but they now think that all that was "bad". Ha.
Here is another refutation.
Today that whole paragraph has disappeared! Instead there is something on snake venom with this footnote:
Note: Myth 9 previously discussed the relationship between high cholesterol and heart disease. We were working with some bad information and now believe it was incorrect, so we've added this snake bite myth instead. We apologize for any confusion or misinformation.
What a bunch of tossers! They originally pointed to Malcolm Kendrick and Chris Kresser who refuted the cholesterol hypothesis but they now think that all that was "bad". Ha.
Here is another refutation.
Comments
Funny too because I had starred that article in Reader to go back to see if they actually were on the level. Saw your article first and gave a nod like you did. What a crock that they revised it. Wonder who put the screws to them...
Recorded for posterity :)
http://i.imgur.com/0cQYE.png
Pathetic. The article was about science. So the witches came in and got them to pull it down...