Skip to main content

The Limits to Performance

I went to an event last night at the Edinburgh Science Festival.  It was a fascinating lecture by 4 of the UK's (world's?) top exercise scientists.

The lecture was called How far, how fast how high?
What are the genetic, physiological, biochemical and psychological limits to the human body? Former UK Athletics Performance Director, Professor Dave Collins, joins sports scientists Dr Yannis Pitsiladis and Professor Andy Jones, and nutritionist Professor Ron Maughan to discuss the physiologic, genetic, psychosocial and economic determinants of success, and the limits to performance. Citius, Altius, Fortius is the Olympic motto, but how far, how fast and how high can we actually go?

All of the talks were excellent:

  • Dave Colins spoke about the psychology of winning - all things being equal, elite athletes are those who believe that they are the best.   He gave a fascinating report of a study he had done on powerlifters.  He told them they were getting steroids when in fact they were on a placebo.  They all got significantly stronger.  He really stressed that believing that you are on the right training system and that you will succeed is vitally important.  Yes talent and ability are fundamental but the winners are those that believe in themselves and their approach.  I've been thinking a lot about this area recently and the whole idea of the placebo.  Really interesting and under-appreciated.  
  • Andy Jones  talked about the physiology of champions.  He had worked with Paula Radcliffe and spoke about the unique nature of her body.  She is basically in the very top percentiles of the distribution.  Her VO2 max, velocity at VO2 max etc are all off te charts.  In testing her he was able to predict her times and indeed her world record times at various distances.  This stressed the importance of talent, of ability....but he also mentioned that a key thing with Paula was her ability to hurt herself, to push herself.  Again it is mental.
  • Yannis Pitsiladis talked about genetics.  He had looked at the DNA of the top runners in the world, all Africans.  Sprinters tend to be West African and middle / long distance runners tend to be East African (Ethiopian/Kenyan etc).  He had looked at certain candidate genes and also done GWAS but had  not identified any real genes that were responsible.  It was all pointing towards epigenetics,  environmental factors that activate the genes.
  • Ron Maughan talked about nutrition, but he key focus was that nutrition is really bottom of the pile - talent, trainability, training, psychology, social support etc are all much more important.  He also stressed that much of the key science is actually very old - he referred to papers from 1919 by Bainbridge.
It has long been recognized that the main seat of fatigue after muscular exercise is in the central nervous system. Mosso long ago stated that “nervous fatigue is the preponderating phenomenon and muscular fatigue is also at the bottom of the nervous system”. There appear, however, to be two types of fatigue, one arising entirely within the central nervous system, the other in which fatigue of the muscles themselves is superadded to that of the nervous system.
  •  This idea really reminded me of the ideas of Marcora
Anyway, a really interesting evening.

Comments

Steven Sashen said…
The question for Dave Collins is NOT "did powerlifters who thought they were on steroid but who were actually getting a placebo get stronger?"

The question is: "Did A CONTROL group of powerlifters on a similar training regimen get stronger as well?"

And, really, the other questions are: If so, is there a statistical difference between the two groups? And can we reproduce this study in another lab? And were the administrators of the placebo aware of what they were doing? And the trainers (did the trainers act differently, thinking the athletes were juicing)? And did all the trainees get equally stronger? If not, then are you prepared to say that the ones who got the most benefit were the ones that "believed" the most?

Since we can't measure "belief" before the fact, people use belief to explain away phenomenon that they have no other explanation for.

It's really hard to design a good study.
Chris said…
Hi Stephen

It was a pretty good study from what I recall. I don't have the full paper, but the abstract is here

http://journals.humankinetics.com/tsp-back-issues/tspvolume14issue3september/expectancyeffectsandstrengthtrainingdosteroidsmakeadifference
Chris said…
Sorry - I meant Steven
Steven Sashen said…
Yeah, I'd love to see the full paper. The abstract, not surprisingly, makes the results seem unequivocal ;-)
SimonM said…
What strikes me is the idea that "elite athletes are those who believe that they are the best" juxtaposed with the information that Paula Radcliffe's V02max and vV02max are "off the charts".

Ok, you/Dave Collins did add "all things being equal"...whatever THAT means.

To complicate things further, I'd also love to see control group details, but here's the thing - I can guarantee that the control group, if there was one, was NOT controlled for their diet/nutrition/supplement intake to make sure it was a level playing field. Why is that important?

Yannis Pisiladis cotrectly (in my view) points at epigenetics as a key factor. The epigenetics factor gives FAST adaptations to the environment and - despite Ron Maughan's assertion that nutrition is bottom of the pile - we know that nutrition is one of the KEY promoters of epigenetic change. We also know that, through that mechanism, the mind exerts physiological effects.

Great report. What these type of symposiums need is an unashamed generalist to tell the specialists what it is they are actually finding :)

Popular posts from this blog

Dry January

I mentioned a few weeks ago that I was taking part in "Dry January".  I didn't make a big song and dance about it, but I decided to go for a calendar month or so with no alcohol.  A few people have asked me about my experience, so here are a few points. Why take a break from drinking? Alcohol is an interesting topic.  As a drug it is widely accepted in society, central to so much of our socialising and leisure.  There seem to be lots of health benefits - so we are told - yet there are also a lot of problems in terms of health, relationships and lifestyle that come from drinking. Over a few years I'd begun to become aware and then concerned that I was drinking too much and too regularly.  I am in a busy and stressful job and sometimes a glass of wine after work to relax is really helpful.  But over time, one glass became two.  Two glasses became ....I might as well finish the bottle.  A habit got established....and was starting to get too e...

So where have I been?

You will have noticed that this blog has been quiet for a while....  There are a few reasons for that, reasons that I thought I'd list here: WORK -  my day job has been incredibly busy and stressful this year. Working 10-14 hour days the last thing on my mind when I got home was putting something on here.  FACEBOOK/TWITTER - I suppose I've been using other channels to do some of what I used to do here. Quick fire posts pointing to interesting studies or news etc tend to get posted to Twitter (@chrishighcock) or to the Facebook Hillfit group http://www.facebook.com/groups/263083947097000/  REASSESSMENT - I've found myself less comfortable with some of the positions I've taken in the past. Sometimes I'm embarrassed by some of the things I've promoted. I'm not Paleo or low carb. I think Tabata and intervals are misunderstood and misapplied. I cannot really claim to be HIT.   I find myselfunable  honestly to post things on here and pretend that I am some sort o...

Taking up space for a brief update

I've a couple of posts in draft that I will get up soon -  an update / reflection on Dry January and some thoughts on the scheduling benefits of short workouts if your life is busy.  Before that though, I am pointing to something else. However, I wanted to highlight something that is coming this weekend that I've been involved in.   Amber Rogers (Gokaleo and author of Taking Up Space ) has been pulling together a bundle of books from various authors with a common theme, one that I've been pushing here recently.   Keep it simple, avoid the hype, be patient, be consistent and flee the gurus.   I've talked before about how we get obsessed with pushing for more and more, when enough is OK.  I've given my view that so much of the health and fitness internet world is more like a gnostic religion than something that will benefit your life. There are other voices out there saying similar things and I'll be pointing to a bundle of books later this week ...