I've a couple of posts in draft that I will get up soon - an update / reflection on Dry January and some thoughts on the scheduling benefits of short workouts if your life is busy. Before that though, I am pointing to something else. However, I wanted to highlight something that is coming this weekend that I've been involved in. Amber Rogers (Gokaleo and author of Taking Up Space ) has been pulling together a bundle of books from various authors with a common theme, one that I've been pushing here recently. Keep it simple, avoid the hype, be patient, be consistent and flee the gurus. I've talked before about how we get obsessed with pushing for more and more, when enough is OK. I've given my view that so much of the health and fitness internet world is more like a gnostic religion than something that will benefit your life. There are other voices out there saying similar things and I'll be pointing to a bundle of books later this week ...
Comments
You'd have to eat 10 apples a day to get 35% of your calories from them. Modern apples are bigger and sweeter than wild fruit, so you'd probably have to eat a lot more than that. Plus, fruit is seasonal.
There may have been some starchy tubers, but again that's seasonal and probably not abundant enough to account for that many calories.
I don't believe that they got 2-3% of their calories from honey either. Honey is not a common food in any part of the world. That means they would have to eat an average of 2 tbsp honey per person per day. At that rate, they'd probably deplete the local honey stocks in a couple of months.
So basically I think it's implausible that they ate that much carb because it probably was not an abundant nutrient. I could believe 15%, with seasonal variability.
Also, I don't agree with their figures for polyunsaturated and saturated fat. I've seen some pretty potent rebuttals of those numbers. When you include organ meats and the fact that HGs went after the fattest animals, you get a pretty hefty amount of saturated fat. They reference Cordain in that article, who has been notoriously wrong about fat composition of HG diets in his earlier studies.
It doesn't square with what I've read about 20th-21st century HGs, or the archeology I'm aware of.
Although I have to admit, if every American ate like that paper claims early humans ate, we would definitely be healthier than we are now.
Thanks for posting the article.