This is an interesting paper just published (the whole thing is available as a pdf). It really challenges some of the more generally accepted ideas about weight loss. For example it challenges the ideas that:
Still, it is worth reading.
Validity of claims made in weight management research: a narrative review of dietetic articles
- you can easily lose weight by being in calorie deficit
- it is always healthier to lose weight
Still, it is worth reading.
Validity of claims made in weight management research: a narrative review of dietetic articles
The best available evidence demonstrates that conventional weight management has a high long-term failure rate. The ethical implications of continued reliance on an energy deficit approach to weight management are under-explored.
Comments
Additionally, especially here in the US, we equate thinness with health. We feel starvation and chronic exercise are noble pursuits.
Personally, I work with many clients whose primary goal is weight loss. They don't care about health or what means they have to endure to get there. It is sad. They have such a negative image of their bodies (even though they have average or better than average levels of body fat) and are constantly demonstrating signs of eating disorders. When clients get to their goal they look weak, emaciated, tired, and unhealthy. But, they are happy.
Less and less do I take on 'fat loss' clients. While I have been successful in helping them reach their goals (even with <3kg/month weight loss), I can't help but feel like they are unhealthier after than they were before.